Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
| От | Don Baccus | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000207085422.01092ec0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
At 11:31 AM 2/7/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >I hate to see you give up on this. >Don't tell me we fsync on every buffer write, and not just at >transaction commit? That is terrible. Won't we have many more options in this area, i.e. increasing performance while maintaining on-disk data integrity, once WAL is implemented? snapshot+WAL = your database so in theory -F on tables and the transaction log would be safe as long as you have a snapshot and as long as the WAL is being fsync'd and you have the disk space to hold the WAL until you update your snapshot, no? - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: