At 11:24 PM 1/31/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:
>Agreed here too ... I think what has been setting off a lot of the 'red
>flags' is a larger then normal number of 'buggy commits' ... stuff that
>has to be done, but hasn't been as well thought out/discussed as it should
>have been ...
I think a LOT of it had to do with its being committed to the 7.0
sources, which at the time were supposedly going to be released on
Feb 1 (tomorrow).
If Peter had waited until 7.0 beta then dumped such changes into a new,
7.1 tree with 7.1 some months off I doubt there would've been anything
like the reaction he saw.
Didn't we all agree recently that this had to do mostly with Peter's
misunderstanding of how stable a beta release should be in this project?
(as opposed to other projects which run with a "release early, release
often" pardigm)?
If so, I think we're done with this topic and should be willing to just
let it drop.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.