Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Don Baccus
Тема Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
Дата
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.19991214105437.010891c0@mail.pacifier.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY  (Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.rg.iupui.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
At 01:34 PM 12/14/99 -0500, Gunther Schadow wrote:
>so BIGINT (as a synonym for INT8 is not supported). Is 
>BIGINT not a standard SQL92 or de Facto?

I've got Date's book sitting here, and it says that integer
and smallint are standard, with int being a standard
abbreviation for integer.  So apparently bigint is
a common additional type, not standard SQL92.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Arrays