Re: RFD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mike Cox
Тема Re: RFD
Дата
Msg-id 2v0ibhF2dsc92U1@uni-berlin.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-general
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> I saw a post indicating a request for discussion on the creation of an
>> official big 8 newsgroup comp.databases.postgresql.general. According to
>> the notice this newsgroup already exists in google groups and is actively
>> being used. The discussion will be in news.groups.
>

I would like to point out that it is NOT creating a different group.  It
will still be the same, and there will not be a split or anything.  What
will happen is that the postgresql group will become legitimate, and
therefore all usenet servers will carry the group.

So this is a process that should have happened when the
comp.databases.postresql.* usenet groups were originally created.  I'm
seeing a lot of support for this, except for one person (who seems to not
like me personally).

I would welcome people to read through news.groups and follow the postgresql
threads.

P.S.  I am just posting this so people can review the RFD (request for
discussion) and please post any suggestions on improvements/likes/dislikes
so it can be made better.  As not to distract the discussions away from the
normal topic, I will post to the postgresql groups no more than once per
week until it is time for the call for votes (CFV).

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.general
Следующее
От: Mike Cox
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFD