Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2q55w253wxssh42krubzta2f2giakyagcmusie5gpjqy2zjnxs@aaarowf2ab7c обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-11-04 18:30:51 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > First two patches as before, except for a couple of unnecessary hunks > I deleted based on an off-list review from Bilal. I think there may be a less verbose way to do this: The problem is caused by us adding extra_include_dirs to postgres_inc_d, which does not include the private include dir for e.g. libpq. As it is added to frontend_code etc as a flat list, there's no way for meson to know that src/interfaces/libpq should be added earlier in the commandline. The position we add extra_include_dirs right now also seems wrong on windows, leaving libpq aside, as it's added *before* src/include/port/win32 etc. The easiest way to fix that seems to be to simply not extra_include_dirs to postgres_inc_d, but instead either add it to cppflags (the meson variable, not the environment) or add it to the project C flags. It seems that with autoconf we add the --with-includes to the pg_config --cppflags, but we don't today with meson. Adding it to the cppflags variable would take care of that too. A quick prototype of that is attached. Thoughts? Greetings, Andres Freund
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: