Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend
| От | Alexander Pyhalov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2fb1d9923b6995492e7b163e6cb95402@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend ("Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi. Matheus Alcantara писал(а) 2025-11-03 16:00: > So I'm +1 for the idea. I know it's been while since the last patch, > and > unfortunully it hasn't received reviews since then. Do you still plan > to > work on it? I still need to take a look on the code to see if I can > help > with some comments. > > During the tests I got compiler errors due to fce7c73fba4, so I'm > attaching a v5 with guc_parameters.dat correctly sorted. > > The postgres_fdw/regress tests was also failling due to some whitespace > problems, v5 also fix this. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202510251154.isknefznk566%40alvherre.pgsql > I'm still interested in working on this patch, but it didn't get any review (besides internal one). I suppose, Append and MergeAppend nodes need some unification, for example, ExecAppendAsyncEventWait and ExecMergeAppendAsyncEventWait looks the same, both classify_matching_subplans() versions are suspiciously similar. But honestly, patch needs thorough review. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: