Re: CREATE CAST allows creation of binary-coercible cast to range over domain
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE CAST allows creation of binary-coercible cast to range over domain |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2e7acd5f-5d34-4802-a5e2-fa36433d133c@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE CAST allows creation of binary-coercible cast to range over domain (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE CAST allows creation of binary-coercible cast to range over domain
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 20.08.24 19:30, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> I think it's an oversight that we allow binary-coercible casts >> involving range types at all. There are no other nesting cases to >> worry about, because CreateCast already rejects binary-coercible casts >> applied to composites and arrays, explaining >> * We know that composite, enum and array types are never binary- >> * compatible with each other. They all have OIDs embedded in them. >> But range types also embed their own OID, so I don't see why that >> concern doesn't apply to them. > > In short, more or less as attached. (I didn't bother with a > regression test, since none of the adjacent error checks are > covered either.) This patch looks right. > I'm unsure whether to back-patch this. If somebody were using > such a cast today, it might seem to mostly work, as long as the > two kinds of ranges had the same behavior. So they might not > appreciate us breaking it in a minor release. Maybe we should > put this into 17 but not further back. Yeah, 17 and up seems ok to me.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: