Re: Synchronous replication patch v1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: Synchronous replication patch v1
Дата
Msg-id 2e78013d0811060435u10e6542v65c21a6759a31001@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Synchronous replication patch v1  ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Synchronous replication patch v1  ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If the database whose timeline is the same as the primary's
> exists in the standby, 2)3) getting new online-backup is not
> necessary. For example, after the standby falls down, the
> database at that time is applicable to restart it.
>
>

If I remember correctly, when postgres finishes its recovery, it
increments the timeline. If this is true, whenever ACT fails and SBY
becomes primary, SBY would increment its timeline. So when the former
ACT comes back and joins the replication as SBY, would it need to get
a fresh backup before it can join as SBY ?

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "xie jiong"
Дата:
Сообщение: question about large object
Следующее
От: Volkan YAZICI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question about large object