Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Дата
Msg-id 2e78013d0707230934y629a2aeerdae4315cb3424947@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Список pgsql-hackers

On 7/23/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:


Certainly it doesn't prevent starvation completely -- really there is no
way to completely prevent starvation unless you have as many workers as
you have tables, and one disk for each.  What DSM does do is let the big
tables be vacuumed quickly which makes most of the problem go away.



Frankly I haven't seen DSM results very closely, but DSM can help
us avoid full heap scans (and thats a big thing!), but it  can't avoid the
associated index scans and that might limit our ability to vacuum very
large tables frequently.

Thanks,
Pavan


--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Florian G. Pflug"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32