Re: Use merge-based matching for MCVs in eqjoinsel

Hi Ilia!

On 13.10.2025 12:08, Ilia Evdokimov wrote:
> 
> On 17.09.2025 12:40, Ilia Evdokimov wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> In v2 patch, when the join is reversed we pass the commutator operator
>> Oid to eqjoinsel_semi(), and inside that function we immediately call
>> get_opcode(<commutator operator Oid>). Did you mean for the function
>> to take an operator Oid instead of an here?
>>
>> If that was unintentional, perhaps the cleanest fix is to add a new
>> 'operator' parameter to eqjoinsel_semi() so we can keep passing
>> 'opfuncoid' as before and avoid changing the behavior.
>>
> 
> This v3 patch fixes the confusion between operator and function Oids in
> eqjoinsel_semi(). This version restores the previous behavior by keeping
> the function Oid as before and adds an explicit 'operator' parameter so
> both values are available without extra behavior changes.
> 
> Do you have any further comments or suggestions on this version?
> 

I'm sorry for missing your email with the test results. I'll read up on
it as well as the v3 patch early next week and reply.

--
David Geier