On 2017/09/16 0:19, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased version
>> of this patch during the commitfest?
>
> Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before
> the CommitFest started and no rebase before it started should be
> regarded as untimely submissions, and summarily marked Returned with
> Feedback. The CommitFest is supposed to be a time to get things that
> are ready before it starts committed before it ends. Some amount of
> back-and-forth during the CF is of course to be expected, but we don't
> even really have enough bandwidth to deal with the patches that are
> being timely updated, never mind the ones that aren't.
Agreed. I marked this as RWF. Thank you.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers