Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher
Дата
Msg-id 2b72c1d3-c19e-9156-fd91-0cb1707aec35@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 10/27/17 04:06, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?

Implementation detail.  This has been changed in master already.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeevan Chalke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logicalreplication launcher