Re: Should PQconsumeInput/PQisBusy be expensive to use?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Verite
Тема Re: Should PQconsumeInput/PQisBusy be expensive to use?
Дата
Msg-id 2b3cdc52-30fe-4d99-ba42-c3431cf2ae69@mm
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should PQconsumeInput/PQisBusy be expensive to use?  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Ответы Re: Should PQconsumeInput/PQisBusy be expensive to use?  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
    A.M. wrote:

> In PostgreSQL, query canceling is implemented by opening a
> second connection and passing specific data which is received
> from the first connection

With libpq's PQCancel(), a second connection is not necessary.

Best regards,
--
Daniel
PostgreSQL-powered mail user agent and storage: http://www.manitou-mail.org

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why Select Count(*) from table - took over 20 minutes?
Следующее
От: "Daniel Verite"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should PQconsumeInput/PQisBusy be expensive to use?