Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
| От | Alexander Lakhin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2b280c41-236d-4cd3-a7e3-ea86d5c1e257@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom and Michael,
16.10.2025 02:39, Tom Lane wrote:
16.10.2025 02:39, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:I have spotted a couple of buildfarm failures for buildfarm member phycodorus on REL_14_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-15%2009%3A12%3A36phycodorus seems to be running a remarkably ancient LLVM version. I wonder if we should just write these off as "probably an LLVM bug".
I collected all of such failures here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Known_Buildfarm_Test_Failures#check-pg_upgrade_fails_on_LLVM-enabled_animals_due_to_double_free_or_corruption
Masao-san was going to dig into that:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwFcjccSYX+Ap8meEbCccUei-B4tmYsBFu4wMEixKi90fQ@mail.gmail.com
Best regards,
Alexander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: