Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Drouvot, Bertrand
Тема Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Дата
Msg-id 2b14d595-1e8b-e5b6-6098-6a11d19fa1c7@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>)
Ответы Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/9/21 9:17 AM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

On 8/2/21 4:56 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
Hi Alvaro,

On 7/28/21 5:26 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2021-Jul-27, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c
+bool
+get_rel_logical_catalog(Oid relid)
+{
+     bool    res;
+     Relation rel;
+
+     /* assume previously locked */
+     rel = table_open(relid, NoLock);
+     res = RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding(rel);
+     table_close(rel, NoLock);
+
+     return res;
+}
So RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding() does a cheap check for
wal_level which can be done without opening the table; I think this
function should be rearranged to avoid doing that when not needed.

Thanks for looking at it.


Also, putting this function in lsyscache.c seems somewhat wrong since
it's not merely accessing the system caches ...

I think it would be better to move this elsewhere (relcache.c, proto in
relcache.h, perhaps call it RelationIdIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding) and
short-circuit for the check that can be done before opening the table.

So you have in mind to check for XLogLogicalInfoActive() first, and if true, then open the relation and call
RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding()?

If so, then what about also creating a new RelationIsAccessibleWhileLogicalWalLevel() or something like this doing the same as RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding() but without the XLogLogicalInfoActive() check?

At least the GiST code appears to be able to call this several times per
vacuum run, so it makes sense to short-circuit it for the fast case.

... though looking at the GiST code again I wonder if it would be more
sensible to just stash the table's Relation pointer somewhere in the
context structs

Do you have a "good place" in mind?

Another rebase attached.

The patch proposal to address Andre's walsender corner cases is still a dedicated commit (as i think it may be easier to discuss).

Thanks

Bertrand

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dipesh Pandit
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Trigger position