Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database withLC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII
| От | MauMau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database withLC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2EA0B1A05B764781AD94C7124ECDEE33@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database with LC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Noah Misch" <noah@leadboat.com>
> I like (2), at least at a high level. The concept of errno_str.patch is
> safe
> enough to back-patch. One can verify that it only changes behavior when
> strerror() returns NULL, an empty string, or something that begins with
> '?'.
> I can't see resenting the change when that has happened.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> Question-mark-damaged messages are not limited to strerror(). A
> combination
> like lc_messages=ja_JP, encoding=LATIN1, lc_ctype=en_US will produce
> question
> marks for PG and libc messages even with the
> bind_textdomain_codeset("libc")
> change. Is it worth doing anything about that? That one looks
> self-inflicted
> in comparison to the lc_messages=ja_JP, encoding=UTF8, lc_ctype=C case.
Year, that might be a bit self-inflicted. But the problem may not happen
with lc_messages=ja_JP.UTF-8 and lc_ctype=en_US.UTF-8. Anyway, I want to
see this as a separate issue.
Regards
MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: