Re: pg_dump & restore question regarding creating with s
От | Pam Wampler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump & restore question regarding creating with s |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2E4528861499D41199D200A0C9B15BC001D50675@FRISTX обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Josh I found my problem. The dump file that I was using had records that had been inserted a different way --- when I did another dump from the production database -- which I verified started at 1 & incremented to the 644714974 -- then restored from that file (which is what I had thought was being used to begin with) -- the restore worked fine -- the id started at 1 & incremented just as it was in the production database. Sorry for any confusion -- but I learned much about serials & sequences throught this exercise. Thanks for your help! Pam -----Original Message----- From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:42 PM To: Pam Wampler; pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] pg_dump & restore question regarding creating with seri al Pam, > my original pg_dump has records with the id from 1 to 644714794. > my "replica" database started at 4064868 (where did that number come from? I'm not sure either. Questions: 1. Are you dumping just the database schema, or the schema and the data? 2. How were records inserted into the table originally? That is, is it possible that many/all of the records were inserted without using the sequence as their id, but getting their ID numbers from some external source? -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: