On Sep 10, 2024, at 16:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Not as things stand. If we adopt Peter's nearby position that
> the current behavior is actually buggy, then probably back-patching
> a corrected version would be worthwhile as a part of fixing it.
Oh, I see now that my reply to him points out the same issue as yours.
So annoying that the standard is not publicly available for any one of us to go look.
D