Re: user defined function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От andrew
Тема Re: user defined function
Дата
Msg-id 29d3b0b90601260301u6910457au380de9743c90e51a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: user defined function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Thanks, Tom.  It is done by modifying coerce_type() and
can_coerce_type(). The reason I have to keep to verson 7.3 is I am
working on a research prototype that is built over pgsql 7.3. I need
the extra functions provided by that prototype.

On 1/25/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> andrew <andrew.ylzhou@gmail.com> writes:
> > Sorry, I modified the parser code and forgot abt it. Now there is no
> > problem in creating the function. But there is another problem. I
> > create a function to accept record type parameter. But when I call it
> > on a specific composite type, error is reported. The followings are
> > what I have done:
>
> > backend> create function complete(record) returns int4 as
> > '$libdir/qualityudf' language C
> > QUERY: create function complete(record) returns int4 as
> > '$libdir/qualityudf' language C
>
> > backend> select *, complete(Person) from Person
> > QUERY: select *, complete(Person) from Person
>
> > ERROR:  Function complete(person) does not exist
>
> Hmm.  Looking at parse_coerce.c, 8.1 is the first release that thinks
> named composite types can be coerced to RECORD.  I think you may be
> forced to upgrade if you want this to work.  Changing 7.3's coerce_type()
> to allow this case would be simple enough, but I think you are still
> going to be minus a lot of infrastructure that's required to make it
> actually do anything useful :-(
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>


--
andrew

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alban Hertroys
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: filtering after join
Следующее
От: Uroš Gruber
Дата:
Сообщение: many row updates