Re: Add Postgres module info
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add Postgres module info |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29d29c3e-ac9e-48cc-87b4-b1cfd8c2ede8@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add Postgres module info (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add Postgres module info
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17/2/2025 04:00, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 03:41:56AM +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >> 1) Is it intended to switch all in-core libraries to use PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT()? >> 2) Once we have module version information, it looks natural to >> specify the required version for dependant objects, e.g. SQL-funcions >> implemented in shared libraries. For instance, >> CREATE FUNCTION ... AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME' LANGUAGE C module_version >= '1.0'; >> For this, and probably other purposes, it's desirable for version to >> be something comparable at SQL level. Should we add some builtin >> analogue of pg_text_semver? > > I see that this is just a way for extensions to map to some data > statically stored in the modules themselves based on what I can see at > [1]. Why not. > > + bool isnull[3] = {0,0,0}; > > Could be a simpler {0}. Done > > -PG_MODULE_MAGIC; > +PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT( > + .name = "auto_explain", > + .version = "1.0.0" > +); > > It does not make sense to me to stick that into into of the contrib > modules officially supported just for the sake of the API. I'd Done > suggest to switch in one of the modules of src/test/modules/ that are > loaded with shared_preload_libraries. A second thing I would suggest > to check is a SQL call with a library loaded via SQL with a LOAD. > test_oat_hooks is already LOAD'ed in a couple of scripts, for example. > For the shared_preload_libraries can, you could choose anything to > prove your point with tests. Done > > +Datum > +module_info(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > > This should use a "pg_" prefix, should use a plural term as it is a > SRF returning information about all the modules loaded. Perhaps just > name it to pg_get_modules() and also map it to a new system view? Sure, done. > > Some problems with `git diff --check\` showing up here. Done > > No documentation provided. Ok, I haven't been sure this idea has a chance to be committed. I will introduce the docs in the next version. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: