Re: Online verification of checksums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: Online verification of checksums
Дата
Msg-id 29a0ef4d-7d5d-fe5c-253b-3f7f53df0859@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Online verification of checksums  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Online verification of checksums
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/6/19 6:42 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
 >
> ...
 >
> To me the right way seems to be to IO lock the page via PG after such a
> failure, and then retry. Which should be relatively easily doable for
> the basebackup case, but obviously harder for the pg_verify_checksums
> case.
> 

Actually, what do you mean by "IO lock the page"? Just waiting for the 
current IO to complete (essentially BM_IO_IN_PROGRESS)? Or essentially 
acquiring a lock and holding it for the duration of the check?

The former does not really help, because there might be another I/O 
request initiated right after, interfering with the retry.

The latter might work, assuming the check is fast (which it probably 
is). I wonder if this might cause issues due to loading possibly 
corrupted data (with invalid checksums) into shared buffers. But then 
again, we could just hack a special version of ReadBuffer_common() which 
would just

(a) check if a page is in shared buffers, and if it is then consider the 
checksum correct (because in memory it may be stale, and it was read 
successfully so it was OK at that moment)

(b) if it's not in shared buffers already, try reading it and verify the 
checksum, and then just evict it right away (not to spoil sb)

Or did you have something else in mind?


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Filip Rembiałkowski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
Следующее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ltree syntax improvement