Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> We are in cycle because prosrc field is used for two independent features -
> and then it can be hard to find a agreement.
I thought pretty much everyone was on board with the idea of keeping
prosrc in \df+ for internal/C-language functions (and then probably
renaming the column, since it isn't actually source code in that case).
The argument is over what to do for PL functions, which is only one use
case not two.
regards, tom lane