Re: Crash dumps
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Crash dumps |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29881.1310048548@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Crash dumps (Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu> writes:
> Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> Thursday 07 of July 2011 01:05:48
>> How do you propose to make that reliable, though?
> I want to add IPC layer to postgresql, few approches may be considerable,
> 1. System IPC
> 2. Urgent data on socket
> 3. Sockets (at least descriptors) + threads
> 4. Not portable, fork in segfault (I think forked process should start in
> segfault too).
An IPC layer to be invoked during segfaults? Somehow I don't think
that's going to pass the reliability threshold. It doesn't sound
promising from a portability standpoint either, since not one of your
suggestions will work everywhere, even without the already-segfaulted
context to worry about.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: