Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29844.1178051552@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> For now, yes. In the long run, we want to provide users with other methods
>> of encrypted connections than the rather flaky and
>> not-available-on-every-platform OpenSSL.
> I'm curious - on what platform is OpenSSL NOT available ?
And even more curious to see you defend that offhanded bashing of OpenSSL,
a tool a whole lot of people (including me) depend on all day every day.
If Postgres had the market penetration of OpenSSL, our lives would be a
lot different. Have you got even a shred of evidence that GSSAPI is
more stable than OpenSSL?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: