Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2982861.1677956190@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords (Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Date-time extraneous fields with reserved keywords
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com> writes:
> - I'm not sure if we should hard code in those
> three specific reserved keywords or set tmask
> in the default case.
I think we should tread very carefully about disallowing inputs that
have been considered acceptable for 25 years. I agree with disallowing
numeric fields along with 'epoch' and 'infinity', but for example
this seems perfectly useful and sensible:
# select timestamptz 'today 12:34';
timestamptz
------------------------
2023-03-04 12:34:00-05
(1 row)
> Any thoughts?
Why do you want to skip ValidateDate in some cases? If we've not
had to do that before, I don't see why it's a good idea now.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: