Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29814.1406155122@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars (Robert Fleming <fleminra@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform
readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Fleming <fleminra@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, sorry, actually it's using libedit. Is that supported?
Ah. We support libedit, but I'd not be a bit surprised if it does not
cope well with non-printing characters ...
A quick look into the readline.h supplied on my Mac OS X 10.9 machine
(which is from libedit not GNU readline) says that it defines
RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE and RL_PROMPT_END_IGNORE, so at least in theory
you'd expect it to work. A bit of experimentation says that it doesn't
work all that well though compared to my Linux box :-(. Now, Apple has a
long track record of shipping broken versions of libedit, so this doesn't
prove a whole lot about what will happen on other platforms.
I'd make sure that PG was compiled against a version of readline.h that
provided definitions for RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE and RL_PROMPT_END_IGNORE.
If it was, then whatever misbehavior you're seeing can be blamed on
libedit. If you're using an old version of libedit it's possible that a
newer one would work better. But really, libedit is full of inadequacies;
if you can possibly switch to GNU readline you'll probably be happier.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: