Re: autovacuum: recommended?

Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> FWIW, 20k rows isn't all that big, so I'm assuming that the
> descriptions make the table very wide. Unless those descriptions are
> what's being updated frequently, I suggest you put those in a
> separate table (vertical partitioning). That will make the main table
> much easier to vacuum, as well as reducing the impact of the high
> churn rate.

Uh, you do realize that the TOAST mechanism does that pretty much
automatically?

            regards, tom lane