Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking
Дата
Msg-id 29738.907292833@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I guess I'm not understanding something.  How can it ever be correct
>> practice to release a lock before transaction end?  For example, if I
>> write some changes in a table, and then release the lock, wouldn't that
>> allow other backends to see the not-yet-committed changes?  What if I
>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> No. Backend uses xmin/xmax to know is tuple visible or not.

Ah, some light dawns.  Thanks for the clue!

> Postgres does this for system tables only.

OK, so what is good coding practice?  Always release write lock after
operating on a system table?  Or is that only good some of the time,
and if so what's the consideration?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for libpgtcl
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SQL92