Re: Multiple table entries?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multiple table entries? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29724.1251050438@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multiple table entries? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multiple table entries?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> The last tuple is marked strangely I think. I don't think it's
> supposed to have XMAX_INVALID if xmax is 0 but I could be wrong. Also,
> I don't understand why it's marked as UPDATED if ctid and xmax aren't
> set.
No, that all looks right to me. UPDATE sets HEAP_UPDATED on the newer
version of the row, not the older one. What looks interesting to me is
that the last update isn't marked HEAP_ONLY_TUPLE, ie, it's not in the
same HOT chain. Why is that I wonder ...
> I'm wondering if the page allvisible flag is set. The visibility map
> is one of the few 8.4 patches which impact transaction visibility.
But we don't use that while examining individual tuples, do we?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: