Re: [GENERAL] Is float8 a reference type?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Is float8 a reference type? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29712.1506137886@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Is float8 a reference type? (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Is float8 a reference type?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think so it is good idea to write 64bit only extensions.
> I agree, but how about this?:
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil". Do you have good reason
to think that it's worth your time to write unsafe/unportable code? Do
you know that your compiler doesn't turn Float8GetDatum into a no-op
already? (Mine does, on a 64-bit machine.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: