All of the machines are laptops. Maybe some power management stuff ?
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:20 AM, wstrzalka<wstrzalka@gmail.com> wrote:
>> After upgrading to 8.4 on Vista I see no progress on the shared memory
>> problem unfortunately.
>>
>> I think it's even worse now (previously it happened mainly when OS
>> went to sleep & then was restored, now it's all the time).
>>
>> My log looks like this.
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (key=288, addr=02A00000):
>> 487
>> 2009-07-06 11:39:45 CESTLOG: could not receive data from client:
>> iso-8859-1 winsock error 10061
>> 2009-07-06 11:39:45 CESTLOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
>> FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (key=288, addr=02A00000):
>> 487
>> 2009-07-06 11:40:20 CESTLOG: could not receive data from client:
>> iso-8859-1 winsock error 10061
>> 2009-07-06 11:40:20 CESTLOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
>> 2009-07-06 11:40:20 CESTLOG: could not receive data from client:
>> iso-8859-1 winsock error 10061
>> 2009-07-06 11:40:20 CESTLOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
>>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Our application runs on Linux in the production environment, but all
>> the developers works on Windows with local PG installations. Some of
>> them are getting the error - some don't.
>> .
>> It's really big problem explaining to the people that PG is really
>> good database.
>>
>> Is there any chance to do something with it?
> We'd love to, but noone with Windows development experience and
> familiarity with how PostgreSQL works has yet to be able to reproduce
> the problem. As you have a some people that are affected and some that
> aren't, perhaps you can help figure out what triggers the bug. Can you
> tell if there is any distinguishing factor between the two groups?
> Maybe installation options chosen, other software that's installed
> (particularly anti-virus or firewall packages), windows service pack
> level, domain membership, particular hardware?
--
Pozdrowienia,Wojciech Strzalka