Re: running script on server shutdown (TODO)

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> This is what bothers me about having such an informal TODO list. There is a
> danger that people will work in items only to have them shot down, which is
> a great way to turn off developers. And there is also a danger that other
> people will think that the todo item is likely to be accepted at some stage.

I've complained to Bruce about that before --- there are a number of items
on TODO that only one person thinks is a good idea.

Perhaps some sort of [controversial] marker would be useful to warn
people that the item needs more discussion before going off in a corner
and trying to implement it.

            regards, tom lane