Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> ... although none of the issues alone is a show-stopper, but considering 
> all these things together, I'm starting to feel that this needs to be 
> pushed to 9.3. Thoughts?

Agreed.  In particular, I think you are right that it'd be prudent to
simplify the WAL-location arithmetic and then rebase this code onto
that.  And since no code at all has been written for the arithmetic
change, I think we have to consider that it's not 9.2 material.
        regards, tom lane