Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 1 December 2015 at 17:05, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> do we want to
>> back-patch those changes to 9.5 at this late date?

> Surely the whole point of a release process is to fix issues in the
> release. If we don't ever dare put something in the release, we may as well
> have released it earlier.

> I'm thinking about a two stage release process...

> Stage 1 - released, but with caveats and some parts marked
> experimental/beta whatever

> Stage 2 - released, all caveats resolved

> Not sure what to call that.

9.5beta3.  If you're saying we are not ready for an RC, then it's a beta.
        regards, tom lane