Re: remembering locks and dynahash.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: remembering locks and dynahash.c
Дата
Msg-id 29637.1338444403@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на remembering locks and dynahash.c  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> I am working on making resource owner remember a limited number of
> locks, so it can reassign them more efficiently.

Check, per previous discussion.

> Currently I'm having resowner.c remember the LOCALLOCKTAG, because I
> thought that that was the only handle I could use.  But now I'm
> wondering if I should remember the LOCALLOCK * instead.

I was envisioning LOCALLOCK *.  dynahash will never move an existing
entry, and if the entry can be deleted while the resowner still holds a
pointer to it then you've got a logic bug.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code
Следующее
От: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql?