Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 296006.1757797220@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> I came up with the attached patch set.
I did some more work on the comments, adjusted a couple of places that
could be simplified, and pushed it.
> I used two separate patches for clarity and ease of review, but both
> should get backpatched.
I didn't really love the "fix it and then explain it afterward"
approach. It's hard to review a patch if you don't understand the
logic. I considered swapping the order of the two patches, but
eventually just merged them into one.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: