Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Huh, it looks to me like that's an error in the declaration of the
>> citext versions of regexp_matches --- they should be declared to  
>> return
>> setof text[], the same as the underlying text functions.  David, do  
>> you agree?

> Ooh, yeah, dunno how I missed that.

I think we're probably stuck in 8.4, but we should fix it going
forward.  Would you make a quick check if any of the other citext
functions have the same bug?
        regards, tom lane