Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Дата
Msg-id 29466.1338902259@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Assuming that's how 9.2 ships, we might as well wait to see if there
>> are any real complaints from the field before we decide whether any
>> changing is needed.

> We could add it to the catalog without forcing an initdb.

Ugh.

> If we're just leaving it, should we take it off the open items list,
> or leave it in there "in case something else shows up"?

Let's just take it off the list.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: "page is not marked all-visible" warning in regression tests