Re: idle connection timeout ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: idle connection timeout ...
Дата
Msg-id 2935.1035560807@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: idle connection timeout ...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: idle connection timeout ...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: idle connection timeout ...  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Basically, total connections is to be set larger than you think you will
> ever need, while you expect per-db to be hit, and if something keeps
> trying to connect and failing, we may get very bad connection
> performance for other backends.

Hmm, I see your point.  A per-db limit *could* be useful even if it's
set high enough that you don't expect it to be hit ... but most likely
people would try to use it in a way that it wouldn't be very efficient
compared to a client-side solution.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idle connection timeout ...
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idle connection timeout ...