Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29334.1319833688@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
>>>
>>> This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else.
>>> What do we do about that?
>> AFAIR, the only person objecting is Simon. I'm not necessarily saying
>> that means we should drive it in over his objections, but OTOH there
>> were quite a few people who spoke in favor of it and we shouldn't
>> ignore those voices either.
> The problem is, it will break tools. I was one of the people that
> supported Simon in his argument against. Not going to cause a huge stink
> but it is something to consider.
Yeah, but it's those same tools that will benefit from a cleaner
definition. Sometimes it doesn't pay to be slaves to backwards
compatibility.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: