Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2929246.1637260744@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Yeah. I'm inclined to think we ought to just bite the bullet and fold
> CLANG/CLANGXX into the main list of compiler switch probes, so that we
> check every interesting one four times.
After studying configure's list more closely, that doesn't seem like
a great plan either. There's a lot of idiosyncrasy in the tests,
such as things that only apply to C or to C++.
More, I think (though this ought to be documented in a comment) that
the policy is to not bother turning on extra -W options in the bitcode
switches, on the grounds that warning once in the main build is enough.
I follow that idea --- but what we missed is that we still need to
turn *off* the warnings we're actively disabling. I shall go do that,
if no objections.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: