Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
Дата
Msg-id 29284.1319220610@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> AFAIR, the performance hit we'd take by making the vacuum cutoff point
> (i.e. GetOldestXmin()) global instead of database-local has been repeatedly
> used in the past as an against against cross-database queries. I have to
> admit that I currently cannot seem to find an entry in the archives to
> back that up, though.

To my mind, the main problem with cross-database queries is that none of
the backend is set up to deal with more than one set of system catalogs.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases