Re: Daterange question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Daterange question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2922215.1705728907@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Daterange question (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Daterange question
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
> On 1/19/24 20:08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
>> This seems to do what I want:
>> |NOT (drange << daterange(CURRENT_DATE, NULL, '[)'))|
>> But this doesn't use the index.
>> Any idea how to write a query so it uses the index on |drange|?
> Without the full query and the EXPLAIN output I don't see that there is
> much that can be offered in way of an answer.
Well, we can definitively state that the NOT makes this unindexable.
You need a WHERE clause that looks like
indexed-column indexable-operator pseudo-constant
which this isn't, nor does << have a negator operator that could
allow the NOT to be simplified out.
Wouldn't
drange && daterange(CURRENT_DATE, NULL, '[)')
serve the purpose? That should be indexable.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: