Re: Additional current timestamp values

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>>> "statement" isn't a great name for the units
>>> that we are actually processing.  We're really wanting to do these
>>> things once per client command, or maybe per client query would be
>>> a better name.
>>
>> Right.

> What about "query string"?  If you want to include the term "client", I
> would find "client query string" less confusing than "client command" or
> "client query".

"Query string" is a term we've used in the past, and it shows up in the
source code.  I could live with that, but I'm not sure if it's got any
good connotations for people who haven't got their hands dirty in the
code ...

            regards, tom lane