Re: Please define PQ_BUFFER_SIZE in interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Please define PQ_BUFFER_SIZE in interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29209.1115442597@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Please define PQ_BUFFER_SIZE in interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.c (Hideyuki Kawashima <kawasima@ayu.ics.keio.ac.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Please define PQ_BUFFER_SIZE in
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Hideyuki Kawashima <kawasima@ayu.ics.keio.ac.jp> writes:
> While coding, I was surprised that
> magic number 8192 (which is defined as PQ_BUFFER_SIZE in
> backend/libpq/pqcomm.c) are written into the code
> in interfaces/libpq/fe-misc.
AFAICS the uses of 8192 in fe-misc.c have no relationship to
PQ_BUFFER_SIZE or indeed much of anything. They are just arbitrary
amounts by which to increase the I/O buffer size.
Of course they are not *completely* arbitrary --- they are essentially
guesses about the buffering behavior of the kernel and TCP stack.
But they have nothing to do with the server-side PQ_BUFFER_SIZE.
> The result is attached to this mail.
In future please submit proposed changes as "diff -c" patches.
A complete file is useless because it cannot be applied without
risking overwriting other people's changes.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: