Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Artur Dabrowski
Тема Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index
Дата
Msg-id 29203020.post@talk.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Ответы Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-general
Hello Oleg,

my results are different. The analysis looks like this (please note the
different numbers of rows):

Aggregate  (cost=104.05..104.06 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=152.133..152.135 rows=1 loops=1)
  ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on search_tab  (cost=5.39..103.98 rows=25 width=0)
(actual time=76.546..151.834 rows=116 loops=1)
        Recheck Cond: ((to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
'''ee'':*'::tsquery) AND (to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
'''dd'':*'::tsquery))
        ->  Bitmap Index Scan on idx_keywords_ger  (cost=0.00..5.38 rows=25
width=0) (actual time=76.292..76.292 rows=506 loops=1)
              Index Cond: ((to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
'''ee'':*'::tsquery) AND (to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
'''dd'':*'::tsquery))
Total runtime: 152.389 ms


I have no idea, what could be the reason for different behaviour on your and
my machine (windows xp, postgreSQL 8.4.3)?
I reproduced the same wrong behaviour on a machine of my co-worker (windows
xp, postgreSQL 8.4.4).


--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Incorrect-FTS-results-with-GIN-index-tp29172750p29203020.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "A. Kretschmer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rescue data after power off
Следующее
От: tuanhoanganh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rescue data after power off