Re: Fix GetWALAvailability function code comments for WALAVAIL_REMOVED return value

sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:59 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> In short, the proposed fix alone seems fine to me. If we want to show
>> further details, I would add a bit as follows.
>> 
>> | * * WALAVAIL_REMOVED means it has been removed. A replication stream on
>> | *   a slot with this LSN cannot continue.  Note that the affected
>> | *   processes have been terminated by checkpointer, too.

> Thanks for your comments! Attached the patch with your suggestions.

Pushed with a bit of additional wordsmithing.  I thought "have been"
was a bit too strong of an assertion considering that this function
does not pay any attention to the actual state of any processes,
so I made it say "should have been".

            regards, tom lane