Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29163.1028333148@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
>> It should be sufficient to force a checkpoint when you
>> start and when you're done --- altering normal operation in between is
>> a bad design.
> But you have to prevent log files reusing while you copy data files.
No, I don't think so. If you are using PITR then you presumably have
some process responsible for archiving off log files on a continuous
basis. The backup process should leave that normal operational behavior
in place, not muck with it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: