Re: procpid?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: procpid? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29136.1308152423@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, that would probably be a lot slower, and wouldn't necessarily
>> deliver as consistent a snapshot of system activity. It's better to
>> have one set-returning function that dumps out all the data in a
>> single pass.
> I wanted to address consistency issue in the previous mail, but then wanted
> that to be left for later.
> We can provide consistency the same way pg_locks provides; take a snapshot
> on first request within a transaction, and reuse that snapshot for
> subsequent calls. In this case we might want to go a bit finer grained by
> providing a snapshot for every query.
Quite honestly, the implementation mechanism used by the other
statistics views is enormous overkill. I agree with Robert that I'm not
eager to duplicate that for the activity view, when a simple SRF can get
the job done.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: