Re: Core dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Core dump
Дата
Msg-id 29082.971389878@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Core dump  (Dan Moschuk <dan@freebsd.org>)
Ответы Re: Core dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dan Moschuk <dan@freebsd.org> writes:
> | We should probably tweak the postmaster to be less enthusiastic about
> | signaling its children repeatedly.

> Perhaps have postgres ignore SIGUSR1 after it has already received one?

Now that you mention it, it tries to do exactly that:

void
quickdie(SIGNAL_ARGS)
{PG_SETMASK(&BlockSig);elog(NOTICE, "Message from PostgreSQL backend:"...

BlockSig includes SIGUSR1.  So why is the quickdie() routine entered
again?  I'm back to suspecting something funny in Solaris' signal
handling...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dan Moschuk
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Core dump
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Core dump